Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 --- Comment #118 from Lee Howard <faxguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-10-25 01:31:36 EDT --- Hello Miroslav. Thank you for taking this project. I could write up man pages for those executables, but they'd be completely unused because those executables are not meant to be used except as tools by other executables which do already have man pages. I've now changed the EOL codes on COPYRIGHT in the upstream CVS. I've now changed %define to %global. The reason for specifying /usr/bin/tiffcp is because libtiff-tools is a new package that was broken-off from libtiff. Consequently, in order for the SPEC/SRPM to work properly on older Fedora systems before libtiff-tools was broken-off from libtiff, I specify /usr/bin/tiffcp. I am happy to change the package name to hylafax+. HylaFAX hfaxd operates chroot-ed to /var/spool/hylafax and needs access to at least some of the scripts in /var/spool/hylafax/bin and /var/spool/hylafax/etc. So moving /var/spool/hylafax/bin and /var/spool/hylafax/etc to somewhere outside the chroot makes things very problematic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review