Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obexftp - Tool to access devices via the OBEX protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223618 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta@xxxxxx 2007-01-23 13:41 EST ------- To clarify, I don't consider foo-obexftp vs obexftp-foo for foo={perl,python} a blocker as there are some interpretation differences about the naming guidelines and quite a few packages going either way in the repo. This is something that the packaging committee should work on, and can be fixed later if need be. Regarding _obexftp.so.*.*, a simple "python -c 'import obexftp'" will work with only the *.so present, it doesn't need the *.so.*. And 'find /usr/lib/python2.4 -name "*.so.*"' finds nothing here. So I *guess* it's safe to install the extension just as *.so and drop the links. This is neither a blocker though, but is something upstream could perhaps clarify. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review