Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obexftp - Tool to access devices via the OBEX protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223618 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta@xxxxxx 2007-01-22 02:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_...) missing as well. > > Any... pointers to some docs on that? Not that I'm aware of. Just copy/paste the line from /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-perl.spec > > Subpackages should probably be called python-obexftp and perl-obexftp > > instead of obexftp-* according to package naming guidelines. > > Perl naming guidelines say that only about CPAN-originated modules. None of the other cases talk anything about where the software originates from, and I don't see why it would make a difference, nor why the general rule wouldn't apply, see Addon packages (general) in naming guidelines. > > _obexftp.so.X and _obexftp.so.X.X for a Python extension are probably just > > cruft, and could be replaced with a plain _obexftp.so. > > I don't know much about python. Are you sure I can do that? Pretty sure. Will need to verify this though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review