Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746848 Peter Gordon <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Peter Gordon <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-10-19 02:00:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Although the current packaging guidelines already refer to the new directory > scheme, it is not yet implemented. Even the mono core packages still expect the > old-style arch-independent paths. We are currently in the process of updating > rawhide, but until this has finished, we still have to use the old paths. > > For reference: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Chkr/MonoMultiarchChanges > https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/91 Ah, I learned something new today. Excellent, and thank you for the pointers. ;) > These two warnings are "normal" for mono packages (even if we would solely use > /usr/lib), they are false positives caused by the fact that mono assemblies are > not treated as binaries. That's right - these are both false positives, now that you've explained the the multi-arch transition. So these can be safely ignored. > That's only necessary if it is not done automatically via make. In this case it > happens in the "make install" step. > > [...] > > The assembly is already correctly installed/registered in the GAC. > Aha - I had not noticed that at first. Thank you for the clarification. In that case, everything looks good to me with the updated spec/SRPM. dbus-sharp-0.7.0-2 is APPROVED. Thanks for packaging this! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review