Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744339 --- Comment #4 from Jiri Hladky <hladky.jiri@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-10-09 18:05:47 EDT --- Hi Ralf, (In reply to comment #2) > Some further remarks: > > - The package builds using -I/usr/include. > This is a beginner's mistake, which causes the package to use a broken include > path (The origin of this is a bug inside of the configure script) I can see what you mean. How can I fix it? $grep usr/incl configure oldincludedir='/usr/include' --oldincludedir=DIR C header files for non-gcc [/usr/include] Could please give me an advice how to deal with it? > > - The warnings GCC issues, indicates this package isn't 64 bit clean > (Most of the spots GCC warns about are pretty simple to fix). I have compared 32bit and 64 bit builds. It seems that in 64 bit builds following type of the warning will appear (not in i686 builds): bits.c: In function 'get_int_bit': bits.c:327:4: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'unsigned int' [-Wformat] Is it what you mean? Thanks Jirka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review