Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652971 --- Comment #47 from Kevin Kofler <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-10-01 15:52:45 EDT --- > Looks good, isn't? No, looks completely wrong! (I started writing this before Michael's reply, so there is some overlap.) These bogus Provides are still there: libBinEditor.so()(64bit) libCore.so()(64bit) libCppEditor.so()(64bit) libCppTools.so()(64bit) libFakeVim.so()(64bit) libFind.so()(64bit) libLocator.so()(64bit) libTextEditor.so()(64bit) You also need to filter Provides of unversioned .so files. And your regex for Requires also excludes the valid Requires: libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit). You should be matching only lib[A-Z].*\.so\.1 instead of .*\.so\.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review