Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652971 --- Comment #46 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-10-01 15:47:01 EDT --- * If you filter the Requires/Provides, you could also filter out the non-versioned library names, because those are also private to code-editor. * Filtering on just ".so.1$" is unsafe. It currently drops the libgcc_s.so.1 dependency. The hardcoded ".1" may cause problems if code-editor's plugin lib version is changed to .2 or higher. Then more valid dependencies would be filtered out, such as libdl.so.2. Qt's libs are .4, C/C++ stdlib is .6, for example. For filtering Provides, you could ignore the entire plugins directory by using %filter_provides_in. For filtering Requires, a logical OR list of the library base names would work, such as a regexp based on: libAggregation | libCore | libCppTools | ... If the list of plugin libs changes frequently during upgrades, you could add a guard somewhere in %install or %check section, where to terminate the build if the filter_from_requires regexp needed an update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review