Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732218 Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-10-01 07:27:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Feedback has been taken into account: Looks good now. > Hence, I have used: > %if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} > 5 > BuildArch: noarch > %endif Yes, fine now. > Indeed, it allows me tracking all the different versions for all the review > requests and bugs, in a very convenient way: > https://github.com/denisarnaud/fedorareviews/tree/trunk/sim/travelccm/travelccm_732218 > It could give ideas to some other package maintainers :) Hmm, when you use git, I'd only modify travelccm.spec and let git do its job with tracking the different versions :) In your case you should upload the travelccm.spec link to fedorapeople, so a reviewer will get that first (and see the history when manually going there and looking at the versioned specs). Feel free to request a new package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review