Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732218 --- Comment #4 from Denis Arnaud <denis.arnaud_fedora@xxxxxxx> 2011-09-24 13:29:18 EDT --- Feedback has been taken into account: =================================================== Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/sim/travelccm/travelccm-0.5.0-2.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/sim/travelccm/travelccm-0.5.0-2.fc15.src.rpm =================================================== Note that: -------------- %if ! (0%{?rhel} < 6) BuildArch: noarch %endif does not work on Fedora because %{rhel} is not defined (and therefore the whole condition holds false). Hence, I have used: %if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} > 5 BuildArch: noarch %endif -------------- Linking travelccm.spec to travelccm-0.5.0-2.spec, in order to build (with rpmbuild -bs/-ba) and to test (with rpmlint) RPM packaging, fully works: rpmlint does not report any warning. Indeed, it allows me tracking all the different versions for all the review requests and bugs, in a very convenient way: https://github.com/denisarnaud/fedorareviews/tree/trunk/sim/travelccm/travelccm_732218 It could give ideas to some other package maintainers :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review