Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736015 --- Comment #5 from Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-09-12 11:58:16 EDT --- Proposed solutions: (In reply to comment #4) > > [makerpm@fedora15 fedfs-utils-0.7.0-1.fc15.src]$ rpmlint > ../fedfs-utils-0.7.0-1.fc15.src ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/fedfs-utils-* > fedfs-utils-admin.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US namespace -> > name space, name-space, names pace "name space" is fine, but "namespace" seems to be a common item of terminology. Should rpmlint be updated, or can we ignore this warning? > fedfs-utils-server.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/fedfs fedfs > fedfs-utils-server.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/fedfs fedfs I'd like a special user and group for fedfs operation, although we could also use the same one nfs-utils uses, which is "rpcuser" I believe. Really, though, this value needs to be specified via a ./configure option as well, to make it easy for distributions to set it how they like. I'm not familiar with the rules around UID and GID usage. > fedfs-utils-server.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/fedfs 0700L What is suggested? > fedfs-utils-server.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary resolve-junction resolve-junction is going away in 0.8.0, which is why I didn't compose a man page for it. However, we could easily add a stub man page in 0.7, similar to the man page for mount.nfs. > I don't know anything about fedfs-utils, but breaking a quarter of a megabyte > into 5 parts is probably not necessary. We could reduce it to just three: one common noarch package, one for client pieces, and one for everything else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review