Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734531 --- Comment #2 from yellowcake-@xxxxxxx 2011-08-31 13:06:48 EDT --- SRPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4023668/unison240-2.40.63-1.fc15.src.rpm thanks for the quick response. contacted the fedora ocaml guy - rjones. He said unison is hard to package :-) (In reply to comment #1) > Did you try to contact the maintainers? You can find them via the package > database: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb > > Some comments: > > - Use the name macro > I think I'm doing it where it's possible. > - Run rpmlint on all your packages: > unison240-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources > I don't understand this rpmlint unison240-debuginfo-2.40.63-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > > Also use the icon in the desktop file. > it is used, isn't it!? > - Compiler flags are not honored > uhh...how is this with ocmal compiler possible? %{optflags} gives me bad errors > > - Since you require ocaml 3.12 or above, you won't take this package to EPEL5. > You can therefore drop the clean section, the buildroot rm in the install > section and the buildroot definition. > Ok, lowered to version 3.11.2 but still not compatible. > In order to find a sponsor, you should also take part in other reviews. good idea -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review