[Bug 725905] Review Request: p11-kit - Library for loading and sharing PKCS#11 modules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725905

Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(kalevlember@gmail |
                   |.com)                       |

--- Comment #12 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-08-17 09:47:52 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> There is a problem that the -devel subpackage puts doc files in
> /usr/share/gtk-doc/html but this directory is not owned by anything that is
> required by p11-kit-devel.

That directory is owned by the p11-kit-devel package itself to avoid a runtime
dependency on the gtk-doc package:
$ rpm -qlp p11-kit-devel-0.3-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm | grep gtk-doc
/usr/share/gtk-doc
/usr/share/gtk-doc/html
/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/p11-kit
/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/p11-kit/api-index-full.html
/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/p11-kit/config-format.html
...

See the section in the packaging guidelines on File and Directory Ownership [1]
that specifically explains how to deal with gtk-doc directory ownership:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#The_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your_package_to_function


> Also parts of the documentation document the configuration file format and
> that should be perhaps documented somehow in the main package, or even
> some kind of example config files included in the main package.

I don't really want to put large html documentation in the main package.
p11-kit is probably going to be included in the live CD and it's nice to keep
the size down. However, instead of having the docs in the -devel package, it
would be easy to split them out to a separate -doc package. In the future, when
upstream has some example config files, we could also put these in the -doc
subpackage. Would that be better than shipping all the docs in -devel?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]