Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690728 --- Comment #50 from James Laska <jlaska@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-08-09 15:59:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #49) > I guess those js libraries such as prototype or livepipe or tablekit needn't be > packaged separately, right? As I understand it ... under the current review guidelines *javascript* (not *java*) is exempted from the "No Bundled Libraries" [1] policy. From [2] ... In this RPM packaging context, the definition of the term 'library' includes: compiled third party source code resulting in shared or static linkable files, interpreted third party source code such as Python, PHP and others. At this time JavaScript intended to be served to a web browser is specifically exempted from this but this will likely change in the future. I'm not sure where the line between javascript library and javascript framework. Hopefully someone else can clarify the scope there. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review