[Bug 728178] Review Request: xfce4-wmdock-plugin - Compatibility layer for running dockapps in an Xfce panel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728178

--- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann <mariobl@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-08-06 09:31:43 EDT ---
Koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3256082

$ rpmlint -i -v *
xfce4-wmdock-plugin.i686: I: checking
xfce4-wmdock-plugin.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) dockapps -> dock
apps, dock-apps, paddocks
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

xfce4-wmdock-plugin.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dockapps ->
dock apps, dock-apps, paddocks
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

xfce4-wmdock-plugin.i686: I: checking-url
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/panel-plugins/xfce4-wmdock-plugin (timeout 10
seconds)
xfce4-wmdock-plugin.src: I: checking
xfce4-wmdock-plugin.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) dockapps -> dock
apps, dock-apps, paddocks
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

xfce4-wmdock-plugin.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dockapps ->
dock apps, dock-apps, paddocks
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

xfce4-wmdock-plugin.src: I: checking-url
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/panel-plugins/xfce4-wmdock-plugin (timeout 10
seconds)
xfce4-wmdock-plugin.src: I: checking-url
http://archive.xfce.org/src/panel-plugins/xfce4-wmdock-plugin/0.3/xfce4-wmdock-plugin-0.3.4.tar.bz2
(timeout 10 seconds)
xfce4-wmdock-plugin.x86_64: I: checking
xfce4-wmdock-plugin.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) dockapps -> dock
apps, dock-apps, paddocks
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

xfce4-wmdock-plugin.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dockapps ->
dock apps, dock-apps, paddocks
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

xfce4-wmdock-plugin.x86_64: I: checking-url
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/panel-plugins/xfce4-wmdock-plugin (timeout 10
seconds)
xfce4-wmdock-plugin-debuginfo.i686: I: checking
xfce4-wmdock-plugin-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/panel-plugins/xfce4-wmdock-plugin (timeout 10
seconds)
xfce4-wmdock-plugin-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking
xfce4-wmdock-plugin-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/panel-plugins/xfce4-wmdock-plugin (timeout 10
seconds)
xfce4-wmdock-plugin.spec: I: checking-url
http://archive.xfce.org/src/panel-plugins/xfce4-wmdock-plugin/0.3/xfce4-wmdock-plugin-0.3.4.tar.bz2
(timeout 10 seconds)
5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.

Common ignorable spelling errors... No real issues so far.



---------------------------------
key:

[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
---------------------------------

[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
    GPLv2+ according to COPYING and source file headers

[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
    $ md5sum *
    b7e7f90add968dd71efd8d1b026b4373  xfce4-wmdock-plugin-0.3.4.tar.bz2
    b7e7f90add968dd71efd8d1b026b4373 
xfce4-wmdock-plugin-0.3.4.tar.bz2.packaged

[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
- See Koji build above.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[+] MUST: If a package installs files below %{_datadir}/icons, the icon cache
must be updated.
[.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. 
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Packages must not provide RPM dependency information when that
information is not global in nature, or are otherwise handled.
[.] MUST: When filtering automatically generated RPM dependency information,
the filtering system implemented by Fedora must be used.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[.] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), ...
[.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
[+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file
[X] MUST: .desktop files must be properly installed with desktop-file-install
in the %install section.
    I'm unsure if desktop-file-install is needed here. Anyway, we have a
    *.desktop file, but other plugins for Xfce don't even have the
    desktop-file-install scriptlet. No idea what to do here.

[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.

[.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
    separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream...

[+] SHOULD: Timestamps of files should be preserved.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
    See Koji build above (which uses mock anyway)
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
    Works properly on my machine (x86, xfce-panel-4.8.x). Well, there are some
    old bugs to fix from upstream's side, but it works with Xfce 4.8
    in any case.

[+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
[.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
[.] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg.
[.] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin,
/usr/bin, or /usr/sbin ...
[.] SHOULD: Your package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]