Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726080 --- Comment #5 from Matthieu Saulnier <casper.le.fantom@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-08-04 15:31:19 EDT --- URL Spec: http://pcpprod.info/rpm/xnee.spec URL SRPM: http://pcpprod.info/rpm/xnee-3.09-1.fc15.src.rpm (In reply to comment #4) > Yes, that would be fine. However, you don't need create a separate spec for > that. Just build everything from the spec file of xnee (shared libxnee, cnee, > and gnee,...) and put the various files into different subpackages, e.g.: > > xnee (base package): main applications + corresponding data (image files, etc.) > libxnee: shared library files libxnee.so.* > libxnee-devel: header files and libxnee.so > > The static libxnee library should not be built, linked and packaged except > there are good reasons for it. Fedora usually provides shared libraries only. Done > You can drop the scriptlets again, because > - you only have to update the icon cache if something is installed below > /usr/share/icons. > - there's no MimeType entry in the .desktop file => no need to run > update-desktop-database > - the package doesn't install a mimeinfo file => no need to run > update-mime-database Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review