[Bug 684938] Review Request: wmdrawer - Retractable button bar launcher dockapp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684938

--- Comment #8 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-07-26 15:17:39 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> OK, I've patched the Makefile to concatenate the sed commands and the use of
> gdk-pixbuf2. Now it works fine.
> 
> Koji scratch build:
> 
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3232188
> 
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > 
> > 1. Problem: The file-size-mismatch. Did you alter the source archive? Or maybe
> > upstream tweaked something without creating a new version?
> Nothing done with the sources,really. I don't understand it... I've downloaded
> the sources again and used them for the new package. That's all I can do for
> now.

As long as the md5sum's match it should be good, not sure why it was "off"...


> > 2. All the wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding and file-not-utf8 errors should
> > probably be fixed with "dos2linux -k <file>" after "make install". 
> > 
> Not dos2linux, but dos2unix is available from the yum repos. But dos2unix seems
> to need an input declaration. Is there a more simple way to convert the files
> to utf-8 with correct line breaks?

Sorry, you'll have to excuse my typo's, of course I meant dos2unix. I don't
think it requires anything but it doesn't always get it "right" either. I've
used it on a few occasions with just the "dos2unix -k <file>". If it makes
rpmlint happy then we're good, if not, there's always iconv which does require
more arguments and as far as I know doesn't do the conversion "in place". 


> > 3. The incorrect-fsf-address is nothing you can fix but should be reported
> > upstream.
> It is a common problem in older software, such as a lot of WindowMaker
> dockapps. Upstream is dead in most cases. Well, I could fix it by patching the
> source files and COPYING, but I think it isn't worth the effort.
> 
> (In reply to comment #4)
> [...]
> 
> > 6. Not really a problem but you could (if you wanted to) replace the last two

Ok, just thought I'd check.


> > arguments to %doc with:
> > 
> > doc/*.smgl
> > 
> What's the reason for that? I don't know about *.smgl files... Normally, the
> sgml files should be processed with docbook2man to get a manpage. Actually, I
> can drop the English version, because there is already a real manpage. The
> Italian version seems to be incomplete, given the file size. In my opinion, the
> sgml files should be dropped completely.

You'll have to excuse my typo again, I meant "*.sgml". All I was trying to
point out is that you don't need to list both files separately on the %doc line
since globs are allowed. Dropping them is also fine.

Richard

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]