Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721069 --- Comment #9 from Mo Morsi <mmorsi@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-07-21 16:19:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Looks great to me now, still some whining from rpmlint: > > $ rpmlint rubygem-aeolus-image-0.0.1-3.fc14.noarch.rpm > rubygem-aeolus-image.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/aeolus-image-0.0.1/ri/Aeolus/Image/PushCommand/combo_implemented%3f-i.yaml > %3f > rubygem-aeolus-image.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/aeolus-image-0.0.1/ri/Aeolus/Image/BuildCommand/combo_implemented%3f-i.yaml > %3f > rubygem-aeolus-image.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/aeolus-image-0.0.1/ri/Aeolus/Image/BaseCommand/is_file%3f-i.yaml > %3f > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. > > But that looks like a false positive to me - %3f isn't an RPM macro This occurs on every ruby package that includes ri documentation and can safely be ignored. > > Also, we need this: > > - Requires: rubygem(image_factory_console) >= 0.4.0 > - Requires: rubygem(imagefactory-console) >= 0.4.0 Done > > Finally, there's an upstream 0.0.1 release now. We should use that from an > official URL rather than building our own gem Done Updated: Spec: http://mo.morsi.org/files/aeolus/rubygem-aeolus-image.spec SRPM: http://mo.morsi.org/files/aeolus/rubygem-aeolus-image-0.0.1-4.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review