Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719324 nucleo <alekcejk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alekcejk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #2 from nucleo <alekcejk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-07-10 15:08:08 EDT --- rpmlint output for libkdcraw-4.6.90-3 rpms: libkdcraw.i686: E: description-line-too-long C picture files. More information about LibRaw can be found at http://www.libraw.org. libkdcraw.src: E: description-line-too-long C picture files. More information about LibRaw can be found at http://www.libraw.org. libkdcraw.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C picture files. More information about LibRaw can be found at http://www.libraw.org. libkdcraw-devel.i686: W: no-documentation libkdcraw-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 2 warnings. So description-line-too-long should be fixed. update-desktop-database in %posttrans not needed because no desktop files installed. libkdcraw license is GPLv2+ but it built using libRaw sources which have different licenses. libRaw have license LGPLv2 or CDDL. It uses demosaic-pack-GPL2 and demosaic-pack-GPL3 sources. There is notes about demosaic-packs license in README.demosaic-packs: Unfortunately, some of these methods are distributed under the terms of different versions of GNU General Public License (GPL). So it is not possible to include implementation of these demosaics into the LibRaw distribution because LibRaw is distributed under more liberal licenses (LGPL and CDDL). Of course, it is possible to distribute these demosaic methods in separate packages and use within LibRaw under following conditions: * LibRaw is used under the terms of LGPL license which is GPL-compatible * Resulting product (which uses LibRaw AND LibRaw-demosaic-pack) is licensed under GPL2+ (for GPL2 demosaic-pack) or GPL3+ (if demosaic-pack-GPL3 is used). So I guess that resulting License tag for libkdkraw should be GPLv2+ and GPLv3+? This README also can be added in %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review