Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713320 --- Comment #7 from Chris Lalancette <clalance@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-06-15 11:31:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > The md5sum discrepancies are because there is no usable (noarch) upstream > tarball yet. I wanted to clarify things before asking chris to release (0.4.1). > > Note I'll be using ...fedorapeople... rather than ...fedorahosted... for the > URL, as the latter doesn't seem to exist at the moment. > > Patch to aeolus-devel coming up... > > thanks! Hm. I might suggest that you just use the 0.4.0 release directly (i.e. the arch-specific one). Yes, it sucks a bit that it is arch-specific, but when I release 0.5.0, we can then upgrade to that and move it to noarch[1]. Another option is to use the 0.4.0 release tarball, but put the noarch patch in as a specfile patch on top of that. It makes me a bit nervous, though; that is a big change, and I haven't yet run that patch through my full functional tests. Chris Lalancette [1] Given the number of fixes that are coming into oz lately, it looks like I'll probably do a 0.5.0 bugfix release sooner rather than later. So it may not be all that long. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review