Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708475 --- Comment #4 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-06-01 15:12:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > I'm still learning how licences work... I thought that when COPYING said GPL > Version two that it meant GPLv2... I knew the L was "Lesser" but didn't know > that GNU Library == "Lesser" > > So it should be LGPL? "LGPLv2+" in particular; see the entry for "GNU Lesser General Public License (no version)" here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses. > Ok, what do we do here? It doesn't appear to be already packaged for Fedora so > this package would be the only user. Do we need a separate review request? I'm afraid so. I'll be happy to review that one for you, too. > Strangely enough only SimpleGladeApp.py seems to make it into the rpm > package... Oh yeah? Does it look like tepache.py should be in there too? > GUI only app... OK, no problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review