Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705585 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-05-26 12:12:49 EDT --- Well, because both are independent projects, they should be two separate packages, isn't it? But I surely understand the trouble with updating both packages independently, because I don't believe upstream will have nicely building packages. How about trying to build the new givaro, then fflas-ffpack and then the new linbox locally, and if it works as expected, add this package separately? I don't quite see, how all in one source package would solve this more easily... Then you would also need to build one after the other and could always run into problems. Maybe building fflas-ffpack without linbox support would work, then build linbox against fflas-ffpack and then add linbox support (if there is any). Right now, linbox is only needed in an utils header file with ifdef's around, so I don't see a problem, when no linbox is around. Where do you think is BR: linbox needed? I only see a R on linbox... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review