Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |caillon@xxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-12-30 13:26 EST ------- Christopher Aillon said: > And most importantly, no matter who ends up maintaining this in Extras, I am > ultimately responsible for it as I'm the Fedora contact for upstream, have the > upstream cred, and am part of the security and release teams upstream. > Anything that happens between Extras and upstream will come back to me if > only for my opinion. Questions about processes, etc. from whoever would own > the Extras package will likely come through me. I'd be responsible for making > sure security fixes get out at roughly the same time as the Core versions. > And this is an unnecessary responsibility. I think this package needs to be explicitly allowed or disallowed by Chris to enter extras (regardless of any packaging issues a reviewer might yet hit, that's the next step). E.g. please get his explicit consent before any further actions. I've added Chris to the Cc for him to give his definitive thumbs up or down. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review