Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Exaile! - A music player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220775 ------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx 2006-12-29 00:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > IMHO, AFAIK %doc is used to install files in /usr/share/doc right? So if you > > include license.txt to %doc then other users who don't have SPEC can see which > > license this package is using. > one can always do 'rpm -qi exaile | grep License' ahh i forgot that option. Thanks. > > > Review Guidelines said that if a source package contains license text included > > as separate file then that file must be added to %doc > Note it says 'license text'; that file, license.txt, does not contain the > license text, it only expresses what the license is. > Thanks. I got this point now thanks for explaining this to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review