Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690728 --- Comment #10 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michel+fdr@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-04-10 16:48:11 EDT --- In addition to what Michael pointed out -- it should be %{_datadir}/%{name} so the directory itself is RPM-owned, - source line is invalid. It includes %{release} which would include the disttag that spectool is called from (e.g. 4.fc15 instead of 4). Any reason spec releases should have matching tarballs? normally a single tarball is released per version, and you bump the version number if you need to release a fix. The spec release simply tracks spec changes - BuildArch should be noarch since the package does not contain arch-dependent files - the comment for the section dealing with static content is just wrong. They are not being moved from arch-specific Python directories (in fact the package is actually noarch anyway) but are copied from the source directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review