Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #18 from Ivan Romanov <drizt@xxxxxxx> 2011-03-31 14:45:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > here's a scratch build: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2964263 > > There is a suspicious message in build.log: > WARNING: /builddir/build/BUILD/qconf-1.4/qconf.pro:9: Unable to find file for > inclusion /builddir/build/BUILD/qconf-1.4/conf.pri > > I'll leave it to you to decide whether it is important. I have made both rpm packages on a local machine. Unpacked both. And compared it. Files in both packages are identical. I consider that it prefer if I will use standard qmake instead non-standard configure. Altough if I use configure it build binary qconf to create Makefile which it will use for build binary qconf. It's weird and eat more time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review