Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675798 Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-02-24 13:02:14 EST --- Fedora review liblzf 2011-02-24 + rpmlint output: liblzf.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary unlzf liblzf.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lzf liblzf-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. + Package named according to guidelines + Spacfile is named after package + The license tag (BSD or GPLv2+) is a Fedora approved license + The license tag matches thr actual license statements in the sources + Package installs LICENSE file as %doc + Specfile is written in legible English + Sources matches upstream: $ md5sum ../liblzf-3.6.tar.gz liblzf-3.6.tar.gz 8d957cc292ccc8f080726887688b76a4 ../liblzf-3.6.tar.gz 8d957cc292ccc8f080726887688b76a4 liblzf-3.6.tar.gz + Package builds in mock (Fedora 14 x86_64) + BuildRequires are sane + no locales + Package invokes ldconfig appropriately + no bundled libraries + no relocation prefix + Package owns the directories it creates + no duplicate files + File permissions are sane and %files has %defattr + Specfile uses macros consistently + Package contains code + %doc is not runtime essential + Header files are in -devel + no static libraries + .so symlink in -devel + subpackage requiers main with fully qualified version + no libtool archoves + no desktop file + Package does not own other's directories + Filenames are valid utf-8 Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review