[Bug 675798] Review Request: liblzf - Small data compression library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675798

Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-02-24 13:02:14 EST ---
Fedora review liblzf 2011-02-24

+ rpmlint output:

liblzf.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary unlzf
liblzf.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lzf
liblzf-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.

+ Package named according to guidelines
+ Spacfile is named after package
+ The license tag (BSD or GPLv2+) is a Fedora approved license
+ The license tag matches thr actual license statements in the sources
+ Package installs LICENSE file as %doc
+ Specfile is written in legible English
+ Sources matches upstream:

$ md5sum ../liblzf-3.6.tar.gz liblzf-3.6.tar.gz 
8d957cc292ccc8f080726887688b76a4  ../liblzf-3.6.tar.gz
8d957cc292ccc8f080726887688b76a4  liblzf-3.6.tar.gz

+ Package builds in mock (Fedora 14 x86_64)
+ BuildRequires are sane
+ no locales
+ Package invokes ldconfig appropriately
+ no bundled libraries
+ no relocation prefix
+ Package owns the directories it creates
+ no duplicate files
+ File permissions are sane and %files has %defattr
+ Specfile uses macros consistently
+ Package contains code
+ %doc is not runtime essential
+ Header files are in -devel
+ no static libraries
+ .so symlink in -devel
+ subpackage requiers main with fully qualified version
+ no libtool archoves
+ no desktop file
+ Package does not own other's directories
+ Filenames are valid utf-8

Package approved.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]