Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676879 Steve Traylen <steve.traylen@xxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve.traylen@xxxxxxx --- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen <steve.traylen@xxxxxxx> 2011-02-23 13:14:57 EST --- How does this relate to mpich2 which contains: /usr/lib/mpich2/bin/mpiexec and openmpi which contains /usr/lib/openmpi/bin/mpiexec http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MPI may have some clues. As for your last question about signifying which torque version you build against then this is implicit since the package in a particular EPEL or Fedora release and so is built against which ever torque is in that platform. You don't need the "toruqe_XXX" in the release. Also the resulting requires $ rpm -qp --requires mpiexec-0.84-1_torque_2.3.13.fc14.x86_64.rpm | grep torque libtorque.so.2()(64bit) should be enough to tie version. The pbs location changes between EPEL5 and 6 and in Fedora so I recommend some conditionals: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DistTag#Conditionals However this review is by default for rawhide so it must be correct for that. I see there is both a GPL LICENSE file but also a "LICENSE.mvapich" file which is probably BSD. Is this dual licensed or something ? Can you clarify. Steve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review