Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676879 --- Comment #4 from Christos Triantafyllidis <christos.triantafyllidis@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-02-18 18:01:24 EST --- Many thanks Sergio! (In reply to comment #3) > Hi Christos, > > I am (still) not member of packaging group, however I hope you find the > following points useful: > > 1. Fix the Group. Fixed! I searched for what others are using and "Applications/Engineering" seems to be the most popular for mpiexec. > 2. Fix the Source URL Done. > 3. Fix the license: Enter the right "Short Name" as is listed on > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses. Ooops... Done. > > Greets I've also updated it to the latest upstream version. The updated spec is in same location: http://svn.hellasgrid.gr/svn/code.grid.auth.gr/mpiexec/trunk/mpiexec.spec Updated SRPM: http://koji.afroditi.hellasgrid.gr/packages/mpiexec/0.84/1_torque_2.3.13.el5/src/mpiexec-0.84-1_torque_2.3.13.el5.src.rpm Many thanks once more for reviewing this. BTW what is the best way to note that this is build against torque 2.3.13 (currently i'm using release for this). I guess that one could build it agains other queuing systems (if they are in fedora/epel repos). Christos -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review