Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642208 --- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-02-17 07:39:02 EST --- Thanks for the initial review. You're doing the review very well for a first-timer! Spec URL: http://ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-win-iconv.spec SRPM URL: http://ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-win-iconv-0.0.2-1.fc15.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2846284 * Thu Feb 17 2011 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 0.0.2-1 - Update to version 0.0.2 - Dropped upstreamed patch - Dropped the win_iconv.exe binary - Bumped the mingw32-iconv obsoletes The debuginfo stuff is wrapped inside the %{?_mingw32_debug_package} macro. There's no way to inject custom tags in this macro, so adding an obsoletes: mingw32-iconv-debuginfo there isn't possible at the moment. AFAIK, native Fedora packages also don't have an obsoletes on old debuginfo packages when a new package is introduced which obsoletes an old package Once this package gets added to Fedora all packages which depend on libiconv have to be rebuild. I tested this in my mingw-w64 testing repository (which contains all current fedora mingw32 packages) and it causes no (compilation) breakage. I've also done a runtime test using my GTK-based project and it doesn't cause any side effects. This library is also used by the GLib/Gtk developers for their Win32/Win64 binaries of the Gtk stack: http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/binaries/win64/dependencies/ The packages which need to be rebuilt are (according to repoquery on a F15 host): mingw32-fontconfig-0:2.6.0-11.fc15.noarch mingw32-gettext-0:0.17-14.fc15.noarch mingw32-hunspell-0:1.2.12-2.fc15.noarch mingw32-libidn-0:1.14-7.fc15.noarch mingw32-libxml2-0:2.7.6-2.fc15.noarch A simple rebuild is sufficient for these packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review