Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672629 --- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-02-04 10:53:11 EST --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > This is Fedora specific issue, not upstr(In reply to comment #3) > > > > > > Upstream perl reference please. > > > > > This is Fedora effort, not upstream one. No. vendor_dir is an upstream perl invention => it must have a meaning. > > > If what you say applies, this would be a fundamential change in fedora's > > > perl-packaging policy, because so far, it had been convention to consider > > > "Fedora" == "vendor". > > > > > Convention, not a policy. Irrelevant - You are nit-picking on words. What matters here, is considency of the Fedora distribution and simplicity of packaging. > > The location is not standardized in Perl Packaging > > Guidelines. This has been decided by `perl' package owner (mmaslano) about half > > year ago. Yes, you single-sidedly decided something very arguable and have caused Fedora's perl packaging to be inconsistent. > I wrote a proposal, not a policy. You did not write a proposal. You documented what you decided and implemented. > No-one commented it yet, I'd like to take > this issue back to our mailing list to discuss. Provided what has happened, I an not sure such discussion makes much sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review