[Bug 672629] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-Tics - Policies for things that make me wince

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672629

--- Comment #6 from Marcela MaÅlÃÅovà <mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-01-31 06:38:50 EST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> This is Fedora specific issue, not upstr(In reply to comment #3)
> > 
> > Upstream perl reference please.
> >
> This is Fedora effort, not upstream one.
> 
> > If what you say applies, this would be a fundamential change in fedora's
> > perl-packaging policy, because so far, it had been convention to consider
> > "Fedora" == "vendor".
> >
> Convention, not a policy. The location is not standardized in Perl Packaging
> Guidelines. This has been decided by `perl' package owner (mmaslano) about half
> year ago.

I wrote a proposal, not a policy. No-one commented it yet, I'd like to take
this issue back to our mailing list to discuss.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]