Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673839 --- Comment #6 from William Lima <wlima@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-01-30 20:19:53 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > At first, he's on Cc: on this bug report now. Further more, RHEL updates do > not happen that easily - did you ever ask Red Hat for a rebase that is likely > to break API and/or ABI compatibility? For me, it looks like, you didn't... > At second, RHEL 5 ships boost-1.33.1-10.el5, if I'm not mistaken. If you read > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=boost.git;a=blob;f=boost.spec and the > changelog, you'll see that the SONAME was bumped multiple times in the past > to reflect the ABI changes. You know what ABI means? It will affect existing > packages - at least that is the very short form of this. there is no binary incompatibility between 1.33.1 and 1.35.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review