Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673839 --- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-01-30 19:32:01 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) > Yes, Boost had some interface changes and many of which are not backward > compatible. http://www.redhat.com/rhel/server/features/benefits.html with its section "System API / ABI Compatibility and Stability" applies here... > Upgrade the existing package to a new version is the better way (instead of > creating a new one), and should not affect existing packages. > > I see no need for this. Just ask him to update. At first, he's on Cc: on this bug report now. Further more, RHEL updates do not happen that easily - did you ever ask Red Hat for a rebase that is likely to break API and/or ABI compatibility? For me, it looks like, you didn't... At second, RHEL 5 ships boost-1.33.1-10.el5, if I'm not mistaken. If you read http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=boost.git;a=blob;f=boost.spec and the changelog, you'll see that the SONAME was bumped multiple times in the past to reflect the ABI changes. You know what ABI means? It will affect existing packages - at least that is the very short form of this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review