Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662258 --- Comment #4 from Ben Boeckel <mathstuf@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-01-26 19:05:16 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > 1) These errors from rpmlint should be fixed if possible: > > > > > > ghc-pcre-light-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-pcre-light-devel > > > ghc-pcre-light-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > > > /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/pcre-light-0.4/libHSpcre-light-0.4_p.a > > > > Standard Haskell packaging things. These files are used when profiling the code > > which implies that the -devel package exist. > > Shouldn't the libHSpcre-light-0.4_p.a appear in the devel package rather than > in the main package? The _p is the profiling library. The -devel library does not have it. > > > 2) There shouldn't be common_summary, common_description, and ghc_pkg_c_deps > > > macros since these are only used once. The ghc_pkg_deps line should be removed > > > completely because the macro is undefined. > > > > These are also standard Haskell packaging things. I think the %{common_*} > > macros are used in the %{?ghc_lib_package} line which is where the -prof and > > -devel subpackages are defined. > > I don't see any reference to this on the Haskell packaging guidelines page: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Haskell If you look at the spec files generated from cabal2spec, they're used there. Maybe the wiki needs some updating. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review