Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667155 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey Ness <jeffrey.ness@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-01-22 12:55:34 EST --- Hello Toshio, Thank you very much for your time. I have looked over your review and corrected the 'Needswork' as well as the 'Cosmetic' issues you listed above, the new SPEC and SRPM can be found here: SPEC: http://flip-edesign.com/source/python26-httplib2/python26-httplib2.spec SRPM: http://flip-edesign.com/source/python26-httplib2/python26-httplib2-0.6.0-2.el5.src.rpm This package has successfully built on mock using configuration 'epel-5-i386', and checks with rpmlint without errors. I also wanted to thank you for the great pointers you gave on package reviews, I will be sure to use this approach in my future reviews as well as the 3 review you mentioned above. If I have any troubles I will hit you up on IRC, my handle will be "jness" Thanks Jeffrey- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review