Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667226 --- Comment #9 from Dan Vratil <dan@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-01-15 19:04:42 EST --- I did all proposed changes. Ad removing non-developer libs, the Packaging guide states, that unversioned .so should be in -devel. Since TepSonic does not have any devel package and the libraries are just plugins which nothing will be linked against, the developer libs seem quite useless to me. They are just included, because some distributions require it (at least I was told so by packagers). New sources: Spec URL: http://www.tepsonic.org/files/fedora/tepsonic.spec SRPM URL: http://www.tepsonic.org/files/fedora/tepsonic-0.98.1-4.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review