Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bes - Back-end server software framework for OPeNDAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207202 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2006-12-08 09:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I will provide you a review. As I understand it, since you already have > packages in FE, you do not need a sponsor. Yes, I own some packages ;-) > rpmlint on the srpm is clean. It is also clean on the binary rpms, isn't it? > When I try to mock-build the package (FC6), the build terminates with: > checking for a readline compatible library... no > configure: error: I could not find the readline library! > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.14834 (%build) Yep, missing BR on readline-devel. I also added one on openssl-devel since bes depends on openssl-devel, even though there is already an indirect dependency (through libdap-devel -> curl-devel -> openssl-devel). http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/bes-3.2.0-2.src.rpm - add BuildRequires for readline-devel and openssl-devel I had a look at configure.ac, and there is a (broken) macro to look for kerberos, but after a look in the code, it doesn't seems to be used. kerberos is also pulled in as indirect dependency anyway. The autoconf macros related with kerberos and openssl are broken, but the libs/headers are in the standard places, and kerberos is unneeded so everything is right. I'll try to work that out with upstream. I know that there are many unneeded dependencies on sonames, as ldd -u -r says, most of them come from libdap flags, I am also working that out with upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review