Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt2x00-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202528 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart@xxxxxxxxx 2006-12-08 08:50 EST ------- @Danny Yee rt2x00 is in development and sould be considered stable when d80211 stack will be in the kernel tree.. (not until 2.6.21 kernel and rt2x00 should certainly be integrated with it). You can try my testing repository here : http://kwizart.free.fr/blog/index.php?17 http://kwizart.free.fr/blog/index.php?10 You can try both rt61 and rt2x00 kmod for fc6, try the rt2x00 first and then rt61.Don't forget the rt61-firmware for it (rt2x00 only!) (it 's in french but i can provide you support in english!) In fine it will help the review... @John W. Linville I've took theses files to build the d80211 kmod: http://people.redhat.com/linville/kernels/fc6/patches/jwltest-d80211-backport.patch http://people.redhat.com/linville/kernels/fc6/patches/jwltest-d80211-backport-fixup.patch http://people.redhat.com/linville/kernels/fc6/patches/jwltest-cfg80211-fixup.patch I spent few time upon this question but last time i've found that rt2x00 from serial monkey do not works with the patches you provides or needs some tweaks. So the direction i'm involved is to take rt2x00 version from the patches you provides which is not the same package thought... (but certainly a better stable... less support?) wip... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review