Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560787 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-01-08 22:27:04 EST --- I can't say what the license would be. Does the original source not have license text either? It doesn't look like it does. In any case, if it's just a simple modification of the original file, I have to wonder why our python package doesn't just carry the modifications. I went ahead and diffed the two files, but they seem to differ rather significantly. So much, in fact, that I have to question your statement that it's simply a modification of the original file. It looks to me more like it merely wraps the original classes and is a separate work which would carry its own license. I'll go ahead and block FE-Legal; if you can get clarification from upstream then this can certainly proceed; otherwise perhaps the legal folks will see something indicating a license that I'm missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review