Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592645 --- Comment #25 from Bruce Cowan <bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-01-02 14:49:47 EST --- (In reply to comment #24) > I want to clarify that the protobuf jars enable optional functionality and > are not required (any longer) to build mkgmap - the referenced message from the > mailing list is no longer relevant as the build process was changed shortly > after. Now the build file will detect that the jars > are not present and simply not build the protobuf format plugin. > > Reading protobuf is not particularly useful at the current time as in most > cases > you will be reading files produced by the splitter program which does not > currently write in the protobuf based format yet. > > So I think that it is entirely acceptable to build without protobuf support > until such time as the osmprotobuf jars are more easily available. Thank you for clarifiying this. I have updated to r1760. Spec : http://bruce89.fedorapeople.org/specs/mkgmap.spec SRPM: http://bruce89.fedorapeople.org/rpms/mkgmap-0-0.7.1760svn.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review