Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592645 --- Comment #24 from Steve Ratcliffe <rhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-01-02 07:30:07 EST --- (In reply to comment #17) > According to http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2010q4/009248.html, > mkgmap requires protobuf.jar (which is in protobuf-java), and also > osmprotobuf.jar (which is not packaged). Apparently osmprotobuf is in Osmosis. I want to clarify that the protobuf jars enable optional functionality and are not required (any longer) to build mkgmap - the referenced message from the mailing list is no longer relevant as the build process was changed shortly after. Now the build file will detect that the jars are not present and simply not build the protobuf format plugin. Reading protobuf is not particularly useful at the current time as in most cases you will be reading files produced by the splitter program which does not currently write in the protobuf based format yet. So I think that it is entirely acceptable to build without protobuf support until such time as the osmprotobuf jars are more easily available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review