Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alfont - Font rendering library for the Allegro game library Alias: alfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217998 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2006-12-03 14:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > ==== MUST FIX ==== > - Investigate rpmlint warnings This is because I forgot to link the library with allegro, fixed. Now it gives: [hans@shalem alfont]$ rpmlint alfont W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 _i_cx_r W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 _i_cx_w W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 _i_get_cpuid_info W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 _i_is_486 W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 _i_is_cpuid_supported W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 _i_is_cyrix W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 _i_is_fpu This is normal, as allegro consists of a dynamiclinked .so and a statically linked .a filoe which contains some non PIC and thus non sharable asm functions. Also see the "allegro-config --libs" output. > - Why is /usr/include/alfont.h.linux in devel package? patch backup file installed by bad wildcard install, wildcard fixed. Here is a new version with these both fixed: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alfont.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alfont-2.0.6-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review