Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alfont - Font rendering library for the Allegro game library Alias: alfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217998 chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |alfont ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx 2006-12-01 12:01 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== O rpmlint output: PRE-INSTALL: W: alfont-devel no-documentation POST-INSTALL: W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 ugetc W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 ugetxc W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 getg W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 uvszprintf W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 getb W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 destroy_bitmap W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 getr W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 set_uformat W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 set_trans_blender W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 get_uformat W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 masked_blit W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 create_bitmap_ex W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 solid_mode W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 need_uconvert W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 makecol W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 drawing_mode W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 ustrlen post-install rpmlint warnings must be investigated - package named according to package naming guideliens - spec file name matches %{name} - meets packaging guidelines - licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual license - license included in %doc - spec written in American english - spec legible - sources match upstream (unrared upstream and untarred sources and ran diff on output: diff -ubBr alfont-2.0.6 AlFont (no output) - package successfully compiles and builds on FC6 x86_64 - all dependencies listed in BR - no locales - proper %post/un sections - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - file permissions set properly - contains proper %clean section - macro usage consistent - contains code - no large documentation - %doc does not affect runtime O header files in devel package devel package contains strange header file which looks like a windows version - no pkgconfig files - libs w/o suffix in devel - devel package requires main package - no .la files - not a GUI app needing a .desktop file - does not own files or directories owned by other packages ==== MUST FIX ==== - Investigate rpmlint warnings - Why is /usr/include/alfont.h.linux in devel package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review