[Bug 655599] Review Request: remmina-plugins - Plugins for Remmina Remote Desktop Client

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655599

--- Comment #6 from Bill McGonigle <bill-bugzilla.redhat.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-29 13:39:49 EST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> The packages only contain one plugin each, this is why I used singular plugin
> instead of plugins.

That's one way to think about it, and that's valid.  I've grown used to
thinking about rpm names as hierarchies.  In that case:

remmina
  |--------plugins
               |--------NX
               |--------VNC
               |--------etc.

also makes sense.  Nagios is packaged this way, as an example. Some, like
nagios, have a meta package, nagios-plugins.  This makes shell-glob operations
easy for the sysadmin. e.g.:

 yum remove nagios-plugins\*

Anyway, 'yum list | grep plugin' will show both opinions in use.

There's also some elegance to being able to use %{name}-foo in RPM, rather than
having to think about the correct pluralization for each sub-package.  Seems to
me, that'll lead to fewer errors for the next maintainer.

I'm not informed enough to have an opinion on how this applies to non-English
speakers - all I know is that not all languages pluralize the same way.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]