[Bug 652403] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build-rpm-based-os-plugin - Files required to build appliances based on RPMs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652403

--- Comment #5 from Marek Goldmann <mgoldman@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-26 13:03:32 EST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Some notes:
> 
> ! Source
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> a440ee244f272cfa1a2ef680b8beb199 
> Downloaded/boxgrinder-build-rpm-based-os-plugin-0.0.8.gem
> e6d7d2503e9655bb36f73a1ff881cea4 
> rubygem-boxgrinder-build-rpm-based-os-plugin-0.0.8-2.fc15.src/boxgrinder-build-rpm-based-os-plugin-0.0.8.gem
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>   - The source in your srpm does not match the one I could download
>     from the URL written as Source0. Would you explain why?

The src.rpm uses a regenerated gem, but from the same source as pushed to
rubygems.org. When checking into git I'm overriding the .gem with the proper
version (from rubygems.org). Currently - all my src.rpm have this issue. I'll
change the way I build my src.rpm for review for the next submissions.

Sorry for confusion!

> ! No longer needed stuff
>   - %clean section is no longer needed on Fedora:
>     https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25clean

Going to remove it, thanks!

> * rpmlint issue
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> rubygem-boxgrinder-build-rpm-based-os-plugin.noarch: E: non-executable-script
> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/boxgrinder-build-rpm-based-os-plugin-0.0.8/lib/boxgrinder-build-rpm-based-os-plugin/src/motd.init
> 0664L /bin/sh
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>   - This warning comes because this script does not have executable permission
>     while the script has shebang. While I think this script need not have
> executable
>     permission because this file seems something like a template, however I
> think
>     0644 permission is more proper.

Yes this is just a template.

I'll post updated spec and review your package shortly.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]