Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651613 --- Comment #3 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-21 03:06:04 EST --- SPEC file link : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/haddock.spec?attredirects=0&d=1 SRPM link https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/haddock-2.7.2-2.fc14.src.rpm?attredirects=0&d=1 rpmlint output: ghc-haddock.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-haddock-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-haddock-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-haddock-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-haddock-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-haddock-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/haddock-2.7.2/libHShaddock-2.7.2_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. haddock.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. haddock.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary haddock-2.7.2 Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. haddock.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review