Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561286 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-17 11:46:57 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) > Would it greatly simplify things if I split the package into a library-only > package and a separate utilities/wrappers/other package? Not really. This is just an rpmlint complaint; what it's complaining about is an issue but it isn't particularly problematic. In order to truly fix it, the language bindings would need to be build separately, but I honestly don't tink it's worth it. The restriction on using dependency filters are that they can't be used on any package that includes visible libraries (in /usr/lib(64)) or binary executables. This means that as long as the package produces the utilities in /usr/bin, we can't use or filtering. Dan answered the bit about the license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review