Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561286 --- Comment #8 from Dan HorÃk <dan@xxxxxxxx> 2010-11-17 11:21:50 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > Am I wrong or is wrapper/php/dmtx_write.c not GPLv2+ instead of LGPLv2+? It > > appears that this code is linked intothe php dmtx.so module, which would make > > that code GPLv2+, wouldn't it? And if so, you'll have to include COPYING > > somewhere, not just COPYING.LESSER. > > Everything was intended to be LGPLv2, so if you are seeing otherwise then it's > probably due to a mistake somewhere. What are you seeing that suggests GPLv2+? it's the license header in the wrapper/php/dmtx_write.c source file, it contains ... * libdmtx-php is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. ... and it makes the php module GPLv2+ licensed (+ means the "or any later version") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review