Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632858 Michel Alexandre Salim <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Michel Alexandre Salim <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-08 18:32:38 EST --- Hi Arun, I'm not sure about the version number. I use SLIME from the Emacs ELPA repository myself, and the version has always just been the release date. Likewise, connecting to SLIME just displays "SLIME 20100404" (in the case of the last version pushed to ELPA). >From the NEWS file, the version number would actually be somewhere between 2.0 (April 2006) and 3.0 (not released yet). The 1.2 version number you get, it looks like it comes from mkdist.sh, but if you do 'cvs log mkdist.sh' you'll find that the version number was last updated on 2005-04-18 (thus the low version number). The last branch name is SLIME-2-1 so I'm guessing you could use: %global alphatag 20100930cvs Version: 2.1 Release: 1.%{alphatag}%{?dist} <-- note the %{?dist} should be at the end of the release field The rest of the package looks good. It's getting late here so I'll sleep on it and give you a full review tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review