Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641572 Leszek Matok <lam@xxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lam@xxxxxx --- Comment #9 from Leszek Matok <lam@xxxxxx> 2010-11-07 07:43:33 EST --- Quick hack: rpm -i celt071-0.7.1-1.fc14.i686.rpm (built from above srpm) ln -s /usr/lib/libcelt071.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib/libcelt0.so.0.0.0 ... and Mumble seems to work Mumble searches for: celt.so.0.6.1 celt.so.0.6.1.so celt.so.0.6.2 celt.so.0.6.2.so celt.so.0.7.0 celt.so.0.7.0.so libcelt0.so.0.0.0 libcelt0.so.0.0.0.so libcelt0.so.0.6.1 libcelt0.so.0.6.1.so libcelt0.so.0.6.2 libcelt0.so.0.6.2.so libcelt0.so.0.7.0 libcelt0.so.0.7.0.so libcelt.so.0.0.0 libcelt.so.0.0.0.so libcelt.so.0.6.1 libcelt.so.0.6.1.so libcelt.so.0.6.2 libcelt.so.0.6.2.so libcelt.so.0.7.0 libcelt.so.0.7.0.so (not in this order, plus it searches for every name in many directories; not absence of 0.7.1) Since CELT 0.8.1 installs /usr/lib/libcelt0.so.1.0.0, I don't see a problem with installing this one as /usr/lib/libcelt0.so.0.0.0 out of the box for the time being. The fact that Mumble looks for 3 different versions of CELT in the system hints me that maybe it already supports multiple simultaneous CELT versions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review